Behavioral and document signals
Official descriptions mention suspicious answers, behavior that deviates from protocol, slurred speech, and paperwork that can appear suspiciously perfect. The demo update adds concrete document risks: incorrect passport or pass numbers and fake medical certificates. These signals give you a reason to compare more evidence; they are not guaranteed one-step labels for every visitor.
- Listen for answers that conflict with the stated identity, role, or purpose.
- Compare actions with the protocol described in the current manual.
- Read long numbers carefully instead of judging the overall document design.
- Re-check unusually flawless papers against identity and physical evidence.
Physical and identity signals
Alawar confirms taking employee photographs, X-ray inspection, examination of internal organs, body temperature, visible skin inflammation or anomalies, fingerprints, and blood testing. An official full-version announcement also mentions blood sample analysis and microscopic examination of suspicious specimens.
Public sources do not publish exact temperature cutoffs, blood values, sample formulas, or a complete list of internal irregularities. Use each method to seek corroboration and follow the current in-game instructions rather than importing an unsupported threshold from a discussion post.
Context can be evidence too
Developer descriptions include uncertainty around people moving into and out of the elevator, and the broader premise asks whether a person is human at all. Unexpected return scenarios or a person whose situation conflicts with the facility record can justify a wider review, but this site does not turn such scenarios into named anomaly entries without verified full-release evidence.
A disciplined decision moves from cheap checks to stronger ones: establish the contradiction, identify which tool can test it, and quarantine when the evidence warrants isolation. The aim is a defensible chain, not perfect certainty from one clue.